Marine Public's profile
Marine Public
2 months ago

Tankers: Oil Spill Management and Prevention at Sea

Essential guidelines for preventing and managing oil spills on tanker ships.

ship_oil_pollution_pxzjnk

Environmental pollution, particularly in the marine environment, has long been a critical concern. Pollution prevention has evolved significantly over the decades, beginning with the early international attempts to regulate marine pollution, such as the 1954 OILPOL convention. OILPOL, however, had limited reach, serving primarily as a platform for dialogue rather than a concrete regulatory framework. It wasn't until the infamous 1967 Torrey Canyon incident, one of the first large-scale oil spills, that real momentum for change took shape, pushing the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to establish more stringent protocols. This resulted in the MARPOL Convention in 1973, with revisions in 1978, which continues to be the cornerstone of marine pollution prevention today.

MARPOL (the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships) fundamentally reshaped the industry by setting robust regulations to protect the marine environment from pollution caused by ships. These regulations cover not only oil but also chemicals, hazardous goods, sewage, garbage, and even air emissions from ships. MARPOL extended the scope of OILPOL by introducing requirements for more advanced pollution control technologies and systems on ships, like segregated ballast tanks and stricter controls on oil discharge from ships' operational processes.

Oil remains one of the most recognizable pollutants, with infamous spills such as the Exxon Valdez disaster in 1989 standing as a stark reminder of the potential devastation caused by maritime accidents. While such incidents tend to capture public attention, they account for only a fraction of the oil entering the ocean. A considerable amount of oil pollution comes from smaller spills during operations such as loading, unloading, tank cleaning, and bilge discharge. These operational spills, while individually small, cumulatively represent a significant portion of marine oil pollution each year. Tanker accidents like the Exxon Valdez may get widespread media attention, but these day-to-day discharges are far more common, contributing to the chronic pollution of the seas.

One of the most vital aspects of MARPOL is the incorporation of Annex I, which focuses on preventing oil pollution. The 1978 Protocol introduced several enhancements to the original MARPOL 1973, particularly with the introduction of segregated ballast tanks (SBTs). These tanks are designed to reduce the discharge of oily water into the sea by keeping ballast water (which helps stabilize ships when they are not carrying cargo) separate from oil cargo tanks. This advancement made a significant impact in reducing oil pollution from ships, particularly oil tankers.

Another significant innovation came in the form of Crude Oil Washing (COW), a system developed in the 1970s where tanks are washed with the crude oil cargo itself instead of water. This process reduces the amount of oil left in the tanks, minimizing the risk of pollution when tanks are cleaned. COW was seen as a major breakthrough and has since been incorporated into regulations, offering a practical solution to reducing oil residues during tank cleaning operations.

Marine pollution is not limited to oil spills alone. Ships are also responsible for the discharge of noxious liquid substances, sewage, garbage, and harmful chemicals, all of which are addressed under MARPOL's various annexes. Annex II, for example, deals with pollution from noxious liquid substances carried in bulk, setting strict limits on the discharge of these substances and mandating that ships comply with specific procedures to reduce the risk of contamination. Annex V, on the other hand, covers the disposal of garbage from ships, and perhaps most notably, it enforces a total ban on the dumping of plastics at sea.

The introduction of Annex VI, which deals with air pollution from ships, is another critical step in reducing environmental damage. Ships contribute significantly to global emissions of sulfur oxides (SOx) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), which can lead to acid rain and pose health risks to humans and marine life. Annex VI sets limits on these emissions, introducing regulations that reduce the sulfur content of fuel oil used by ships, aiming to curb the impact of shipping on the atmosphere.

It's important to note that the effectiveness of MARPOL and other pollution prevention efforts largely depends on enforcement. Ships engaged in international voyages must carry certificates demonstrating their compliance with MARPOL standards, and inspections at ports ensure that ships adhere to these regulations. Flag States—the countries where ships are registered—are responsible for ensuring their ships comply with MARPOL, but in practice, enforcement can vary widely depending on the resources and commitment of individual countries. Efforts to improve Port State Control (PSC) have enhanced compliance by allowing countries to inspect foreign ships within their ports and ensure that they are meeting international environmental standards.

The measures put in place by MARPOL have significantly reduced pollution from ships over the past several decades. For example, oil spills over 700 tons have decreased dramatically since the 1970s, with a marked decline in the number of large spills reported annually. This success is a testament to the combined efforts of international regulatory bodies, shipping companies, and advancements in technology that have made it possible to prevent much of the pollution that used to plague the world's oceans. However, ongoing challenges remain, including the need to address ballast water pollution, which can introduce invasive species into new ecosystems, and the evolving threats posed by air emissions as global shipping volumes increase.

In conclusion, the maritime industry has come a long way in reducing its environmental impact, thanks to MARPOL and other regulatory frameworks. However, continued vigilance and innovation are needed to tackle emerging environmental challenges and ensure that shipping remains one of the least environmentally damaging modes of transport.

Prevention of Marine Pollution: Strategies and Best Practices

Marine pollution, particularly oil spills, poses significant environmental risks and financial consequences. Spills not only harm marine ecosystems but also impact shipping companies through fines, legal actions, and damage to reputation. Preventing oil spills is crucial for preserving the environment, ensuring the safety of the ship, and avoiding penalties. Spills can happen during cargo operations, bunkering, or maintenance tasks, and the repercussions are severe, often attracting attention from port authorities, environmental agencies, and the media. Here we delve into the best practices, regulations, and actions required to prevent marine pollution and mitigate damage in the unfortunate event of a spill.

Preventive Measures to Avoid Oil Spills

Oil spill prevention involves meticulous attention to detail during cargo and bunkering operations. One of the most critical steps is ensuring that no oil escapes into the sea during these operations. Both ship and shore personnel should be vigilant, constantly monitoring the flow of oil, pipelines, and valves.

Before cargo operations begin, it’s essential to plug all deck scuppers, which are drainage points that could allow oil to spill into the water. Scuppers must be unplugged only to drain rainwater or excess fluid but must be immediately re-plugged afterward. Any oily water drained from the deck should be sent directly to the ship's slop tanks, where it can be safely managed. During the entire cargo operation, a deck-watch personnel should be on duty to ensure that no oil leaks onto the deck or into the sea.

One of the critical aspects of preventing spills is the correct handling of cargo ullages—ensuring that cargo tanks do not overflow during loading. Checking tank ullages (the empty space in a tank) regularly, monitoring valves, and ensuring all systems are functioning correctly, can prevent oil from escaping due to mechanical failures, incorrect operation, or human error. If any leakage is detected from pipelines, valves, hoses, or manifolds, the operation must be halted immediately to prevent oil from escaping into the environment.

A crucial piece of equipment is the spill-tank, which should be installed under the manifold (the point where oil is transferred) to collect any leakage. These tanks must be designed to hold potential spills and equipped with proper draining systems. Valves and pipes not in use must be securely closed to prevent accidental spills.

Tanker personnel must be thoroughly trained and educated on spill prevention procedures and equipment usage. Despite significant training efforts, spills still occur, making preparedness key to mitigating the damage when accidents happen.

Legislative Framework: SOPEP

If you want to know more about SOPEP and its guidelines for shipboard pollution response, you can refer to this article.

A key regulatory framework aimed at preventing marine pollution is the Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (SOPEP), a requirement for all ships over 400 GT and all tankers over 150 GT. This plan outlines procedures to be followed in the event of an oil spill and aims to minimize the environmental impact of such an event. SOPEP is divided into two major components: reporting and response.

Under SOPEP, ships must have clear guidelines on whom to report an oil spill, including local port authorities, coastal authorities, and environmental response organizations. Additionally, the SOPEP outlines actions that crew members must take during an oil spill, detailing the roles and responsibilities of each member on board. These measures include activating emergency stations, deploying equipment like oil booms, and initiating clean-up procedures.

The SOPEP is implemented under the supervision of the ship's Master, with the Chief Officer overseeing its practical application. A typical SOPEP plan will contain:

  • The duties of each crew member in the event of an oil spill.

  • Reporting procedures and emergency contacts, including port authorities and oil spill response teams.

  • A detailed description of the ship's fuel, cargo, and vent systems.

  • The location and inventory of the SOPEP locker, where all spill-response equipment is stored.

Having a well-defined SOPEP is vital to responding swiftly and effectively to any spill, minimizing the environmental impact and reducing the risk of regulatory penalties.

Oil Record Book and Compliance

One essential document in preventing oil pollution is the Oil Record Book, mandated by MARPOL 73/78 (the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships). This document must meticulously record all oil-related operations, including loading, discharging, transferring cargo, bunkering, and bilge-water disposal. Accurate record-keeping ensures that authorities can verify compliance with pollution prevention regulations.

Failure to maintain or falsify an Oil Record Book can result in severe penalties, including hefty fines, vessel detention, and damage to the shipping company's reputation.

Actions to Take in Case of Oil Spill

In the unfortunate event of an oil spill, swift and coordinated action is required to contain the spill and minimize damage. Upon detecting a spill, the crew must immediately inform the Officer on Watch, who will notify the Master. All cargo operations should be stopped, and efforts must focus on containing the oil within the ship using SOPEP equipment like oil booms and sorbents.

Several steps must be taken immediately:

  1. Close deck scuppers to prevent oil from entering the sea.

  2. Stop cargo operations and locate the source of the leak.

  3. Muster the crew according to the emergency oil spill list.

  4. Deploy SOPEP equipment to contain the spill within the vessel.

  5. Lower the oil level in the affected tank to prevent further leakage.

  6. Log the incident in the ship’s logbook, noting actions taken and any environmental impact.

Following the initial containment, the Master must contact local coastal authorities and the ship’s owner. The use of chemical dispersants requires authorization from port state authorities, and the ship should maintain contact with a 24-hour Oil Spill Response Organization to coordinate clean-up efforts.

Tools and Methods for Cleaning Oil Spills

In the event of an oil spill, several tools and techniques can be deployed to manage and clean up the oil. Some of these methods include:

  • Oil Booms: These floating barriers are deployed to contain the spread of oil, preventing it from drifting into unaffected areas.

  • Sorbents: Materials like sponges or absorbent pads can soak up oil, helping to remove it from the water surface.

  • Skimming: Skimmers can physically remove oil from the water surface, although this method is limited to lighter oils that float on the water.

  • In-situ Burning: In some cases, oil can be burned off at the site of the spill, although this releases toxic fumes and is generally not the preferred method.

  • Bioremediation: Fertilizers can be applied to the affected area to stimulate the growth of microorganisms that break down oil into less harmful components. This method is considered environmentally friendly and effective for dispersing oil in the water.

  • Manual Cleanup: Workers onshore can assist in cleaning up oil that washes onto beaches or coastal areas, using shovels and other tools to remove contaminated materials.

Conclusion

Preventing marine pollution is a shared responsibility between ship operators, port authorities, and environmental organizations. Oil spill prevention and response require strict adherence to regulations, careful operation of oil transfer systems, and thorough training of personnel. In the event of an oil spill, a quick response, supported by effective equipment and procedures like those outlined in SOPEP, can mitigate environmental damage and protect marine ecosystems from long-term harm.

138